If you have concerns about the historical accuracy of my work, I will say I studied lots of history at I.S.U. and at the University of Wisconsin. I did earn my honors in history.
…
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, below, or purchase a new subscription.
Please log in to continue |
If you have concerns about the historical accuracy of my work, I will say I studied lots of history at I.S.U. and at the University of Wisconsin. I did earn my honors in history.
I hope this puts your concerns to rest. I do not give coffee shop talk or allow public opinion to influence me, Although, I try being as accurate as possible, we all make oversights. Whether it is my work or someone else’s, always check it yourself.
There are three evident axioms for history that I always find valuable in my studies. 1) History is our tutor. It can teach us much involving every aspect of life and the universe. 2) In its purist form, it is accurate and truthful; therefore, dependable. 3) If you ignore the warnings history provides, you are liable to repeat them.
More than ever before, we need to study political history. An example of this was gleaned from my previous article debunking a few myths out of many regarding Carter and Nixon. Presidents of the past have made serious blunders that appeared to have good intentions. When Lincoln gave his famous speech on the Clinton square, his quote supports the need for unadulterated history. History can show us the truth that was hidden back then. “If only I knew then what I know now” is a perfect testament to those historical values.
In our present situation, we may need to learn a bit about confidence men and dictatorial governments as well. As in a scam, one needs to know how to identify them to prevent being dupped out of a “happily ever after” scenario. The path leading to security has many stumbling blocks and distractions.
We need history to help filter out these dangers. Best teacher award goes to Mister History. It is human tendency to seek out like-minded individuals for discussions. But we also need those who challenge our views. This perception is strange to many. I shall explain.
To hear from only one side is no argument. It could skew the view and tip the scales unfairly. Opposing arguments give strength to both sides. The listener has a better perspective when he or she has one argument that questions the other. It better assures facts over opinions and guesswork. It provides confidence in the conclusion for both sides. It is then to everyone’s benefit to have a point and a counter point.
This is even truer when dealing with a situation that can affect us, our future and forthcoming generations. We still suffer from bad political choices that have flowed through the decades. We should not want innocent people to suffer for our blunders.
The bottom line is as follows: No element of truth can be evaluated in a vacuum. Clarity that enhances facts would be lost. Being assured that truth expressed necessitates a pro and con presentation.
I think we are prepared for the heavy stuff as it pertains to our current political situation.